In an interview with Wired, at the Apps World North America conference, Steve Wozniak revealed his belief that Apple should create a phone using Google’s Android operating system.
Wozniak seems to have lost the plot.
Source Wired
In an interview with Wired, at the Apps World North America conference, Steve Wozniak revealed his belief that Apple should create a phone using Google’s Android operating system.
Wozniak seems to have lost the plot.
Source Wired
Apple plans to release iOS 8 this year and is looking to capture has the mobile healthcare and fitness world.
iOS 8 will look to integrate tightly with health and fitness tracking integration as its headline feature and likely working with its new iWatch.
But will Samsung or another company get there first.
After the maker of the hugely popular Candy Crush series of games on the App Store somehow managed to trademark the word “candy” in Europe, other developers have started to fight back by blitzing Apple with an array of Candy themed game submissions. More than 100 hastily prepared titles have already been put forward as part of an organized “Candy Jam” protest against the trademarking of common words, including such gobstoppers such as CAN D, ThisGameIsNotAboutCandy, CanDieCanDieCanDie and the inimitable Candy_Game (“Press to hear Candy.”)
In the meantime, the developer at the centre of the controversy, King.com, continues to pursue legal action against those who use any of words in its arsenal of trademarks, even those that have nothing to do with sugar. This apparently includes one poor dev who had the cheek to use the word “saga” in a Norse mythology-themed game called The Banner Saga — a title that treads too closely to Candy Crush Saga, according to legal documents filed by King. What’s more, now that King has also filed for new trademarks in the US, this whole saga could be about to get totally farcical.
Sammobile published the above screen shot from the new Samsung S Voice app.
It features a flatter lighter look. And for a minute very Apple Siri alike.
What do you think?
The below is just confirmed humour.
Details arrived via a secret sauce in Gavin’s Gadgets inbox of the larger of the 2 new iPhones.
Apple will take the iPad Mini and make it into a phablet phone. Bigger than all it’s competitors, it will have Samsung Note owners quivering in their boots as to how small their phones now look.
Apple’s designs teams decided to go the bigger is better route. More as this confirmed humour develops.
Apple, Google and Amazon have all posted their financial results over the last 24 hours or so.
Apple produced one of its best quarters yet it’s stock went down 8%, due to analysts not being happy.
Google missed its earnings substantially due to losses at Motorola but it’s shares rose 9%, due to happy analysts.
Amazon also produced a good result despite market conditions but missed a few parameters, so once again analysts were unhappy and it’s shares dropped 5%.
Is it me, but what do analysts know about running major companies in real life, instead of shifting pieces of paper or working computer screens.
Apple – it’s got more cash in the bank than most countries and is still making billions in profits. Not millions. Billions. And it has a captive loyal customer base.
Amazon had revenue of $25.59 billion, and earnings per share of $0.51. The company has operating income of $510 million in the period, up 26% year over year. And that wasn’t enough. So shares dropped 5%.
Google had increases in both revenue and income. For the fourth quarter, Google reported revenues of $16.86 billion, up 17 percent year-over-year. Operating income was $3.92 billion, or 23 percent of revenues. Net income rang in at $3.38 billion, up from $2.89 billion in Q4 2012. The now sold Motorola contributed a $384 million loss in Q4 2013.
These 3 companies are all performing at the top level and yet analysts seem to know better. Hmmm…
If you own a QX10 or QX100 hub lens as shown above but have a device or tablet over 85mm in width then Sony has the answer. The SPA-TA1. Due out around April, this is an attachment that comes in different sizes as below.
(Depth × height width ×) size:
(1) about 85 × 65.6 × 33.9Mm
(2) about 106 × 65.6 × 33.9Mm
(3) about 127 × 65.6 × 33.9Mm
(4) about 148 × 65.6 × 33.9 mm
(5) about 169 × 65.6 × 33.9Mm
(6) about 190 × 65.6 × 33.9mm Weight: about 31g ((6) is installed) Material: Plastic
※ The included attachment of DSC-QX100/QX10 shipped with smartphone of 54-75mm width.
Source – Sony Japan
Below is a screenshot detailing the pricing for buying a Samsung Note 3 from Amazon (not via a marketplace seller). Look at the price variations. And why the sudden hike now? This hike also applies for accessories too.
Below is the HTC One in Silver.
And now the Sony Xperia Z1.
Just one more. The Nokia Lumia 925. This has seem some huge drops.
The fluctuation in pricing is crazy. If you buy an iPhone from Apple it is the same price pretty much for the whole 12 months.
What’s your views on this?
Sony is offering upgrades for the Sony QX10 and QX100 hub lenses.
Improvements after version 2 firmware upgrade –
-ISO Setting added
-The QX10 has a ISO 3200 from just 1600, and the QX100 moves to ISO 12800 support from just 3200.
-Movie Recording size changed: MP4 1440 x 1080(30p) to MP4 1920 x 1080(30p)
-Shutter Speed Priority Shooting mode added (DSC-QX100 only)
For the QX10 head over to the Sony Asia download page or click here for direct access. . Select downloads, computer system and the appropriate file will be downloaded.
For the QX100, head over again or click here for direct access. Then select downloads and follow the instructions dependant on your PC operating system.
These are really important updates and now make these hub lenses even more fantastic.
The process takes about 10 mins for each lens.
I don’t think it matters which manufacturer you want to aim this headline towards, they seem to be all the same now.
Whether you get your new phone sim free or with a contract you are paying between £309-709 for your phone. And yet it seems every newly released phone is littered with software faults, sometimes even hardware. Harsh but true. And these should have been removed prior to release. But more and more the pressure to release the next model sacrifices quality control.
Let’s have a look at some examples –
Sony Xperia Z1 – Sony labelled this 20.7mp camera smartphone as the best thing since sliced bread. Well if you tried taking photos with this at launch they were crap. Superior Auto was so bad it was a disgrace especially considering Sony’s camera expertise. Fanboys will defend this saying you can take decent photos in manual mode. And yes they are better but please stop making excuses for the large companies. They messed up. The fit and finish were probably the best in class. A real premium finish. 6 months down the line, loads of promises later, Sony have released several firmwares and improved the situation, but it is not totally fixed. If you don’t mind experimenting with the camera settings you might take a great photo. Meanwhile, people’s’ smiles are lost.
Apple iPhone 5S – starting price £549. Released 21st September 2013. It’s still has several notable bugs. Poor battery for far too many people. Random and constant reboots with the springboard. This is Apple with it’s everything just works. No it doesn’t. It works sometimes. Now Apple are rumoured to be working hard on fixing the software. Expected eta March 2014 some 6 months later. Shame as the iPhone 5S is an amazing piece of hardware versus it’s tiny size.
Samsung – oh I could really rant off with Samsung and the S4 or Note 3. And that is despite loving my Note 3. The S4 was Samsung’s downfall of lying to customers. 16gb model was the only memory configuration available in the UK. With 8gb free. Sorry. That’s inexcusable to leave such little memory free. With public pressure they said they would fix it on BBC Watchdog. Over six months later, Which has reported that there is even less memory available now. The S4 was so full of bugs at launch I think I will stop now before I explode. And yet it could have been so much better. And as to the Note 3. A bug fest at launch that was so bad and extremely inflated deliberately in price at launch that it was a disgrace.
So after you and me and other members of the public beta tested these phones for over 6 months they are now excellent especially the Note 3. To give you some idea Samsung released in 3 months, 7 firmware updates for the Note 3 to try and fix all the problems. Surely these should have been done prior to launch or at least some of them.
So perhaps we should all wait 6 months after a phone is released, see if the faults have been fixed as promised and then decide to buy it?
If you like the next shiny phone or the latest at your upgrade, I doubt you would get an older model unless the deal was stunning.